Sunday, August 2, 2009

I was interviewed for Animation Magazine

You could either buy the August 2009 issue of Animation Magazine (it got Sponge Bob on the cover!), get it free at San Diego Comic Con (it got Ponyo on the cover!--but that's too late now) or check it out on the web.

http://www.animationmagazine.net/article/10350

Go on, do it now. They quote me a couple times and I sound kinda smart.




Anyway, the interview was more like an e-mail questionnaire and I thought you might like to read my complete answers to that questionnaire.

Questions by Tom McLean.



Is there a difference in your mind between webcomics and print comics?

There are more similarities than differences. At least with the sort of webcomics that I do. I design them anticipating print. Its more a kin to the differences between watching your favorite movie in the theater vs. DVD vs. airing on TV vs. downloaded illegally.

Much of it is based on the way its delivered. I can read a print comic and enjoy it on a comfortable couch or at a peaceful park or wherever. Most people read webcomics on a computer, most likely, sitting on an uncomfortable office chair, in a cubicle, fearing the boss might see them goof off. You have different expectations from a computer than from a book. The computer is interactive and engaging. You expect it to play video, have animated graphics, talk to your friends, multi-task.

This is why the most successful webcomics are in a daily strip format. If the content isn't interactive then people want it short. True, they have the option of looking in the archives and spending an entire day reading 10 years worth of Sinfest.net, but that's an option.

Now this is something that might change as screen culture and technology changes. We might have mobile devices that we could read on a comfortable couch. And the expectations of those mobile devices might not put us in a multi-task mode.

Another difference with a webcomic is the use of hyperlinks. My current project, God(tm) uses hyperlinks to something I'm making a reference of. For example, the one I just gave you, a character is singing a song, and comics being a visual medium, songs don't translate well. But the hyperlinks are of three different performances of the same song.

There's also page 13 of God(tm) which speaks for itself. (its a roll-over image) And the use of Infinite Canvas



Do you approach creating a comic for the web differently than one you do for print, i.e., does the story affect your decision to do it on the web vs. in print or vice versa?

To a degree. My past work was just putting a print comic on the web (Speak No Evil is like this). But my current work, I'm considering the short attention span that people have in front of a screen. I like doing long stories and those don't fair as well as 4 panel daily strips. I try to make up for that by making the pacing faster. There's a staccatto rhythm to my current work. The story is constantly interrupted like a Monty Python skit (plus the humor is sort of Monty Python too).

Last night I was just re-planning a page because the pacing wasn't fast enough. Though earlier drafts of the page may work in a printed comic, it wont work for this particular webcomic.

Also, since a certain look and feel is expected from a print comic, a history and subculure that goes back to the 1930's, I think I'm being more experimental with the look than I would if I did a print comic.

As for how I approach a print comic, when you read a page, you are aware of two pages, the one your attention is at and the one next to it. If you want to surprise the reader or reveal something, it can only be on an even numbered page. In web, you can have more surprises with a click of the mouse. Every page, potentially, can show a shocking and unexpected revelation.



Do you have a formal process for creating webcomics, i.e, a script, pencils, inks, colors, etc.? What tools do you use?

My creative process in general:

1)I draw a little comic in my sketchbook, my first draft. I find it a waste of time to start out with a script because I can draw faster than I could describe with words. I write the dialogue as I go. I figure out the composition.

2) I take the sketchy comic and translate that into a script. Its easier to edit dialogue this way or work with a scene that's more dependent on words than pictures.

3) I make another sketchy comic based on steps one and two. If I'm not happy with the sketchy comic, I go back to step two and might go back and forth between script and drawing until I have a good sketchy comic.

4) I take those sketches of pages, they're maybe 4x6 inches, scan them, figure out word balloon composition in photoshop, put in guide rules for perspective and print it out in non-photo blue.

5) In blue pencil I draw in details and ink.

6) Scan, color, maybe some dialogue changes and put it up online.


Web comics vary quite a bit in their presentation, so how do you decide the best way to present your story?

I'm not exactly sure what you're asking and you might end up sending me a follow-up email on this subject, but here I go:

One thing I do (also, a subtle difference between web vs print) is have different backgrounds or wallpapers for each part of the story. If the page is about anger, then you'll see red. If it takes place in Heaven or on an airplane, you'll see the sky.

There's one section in God(tm) where I give a back story. But the designs of the artwork tells a the history of visual mass media. I take advantage of the wallpapers to further emphasize this theme.


How much thought do you give to making your web comics "print ready" should a publishing opportunity arise?

I always take it into consideration because it has always been my goal to be a print comic book artist (I find it strange that I actually have to type the word "print" in order to make myself clear). Since everyone's monitor is not created equal, I anticipate for smaller monitors. A print comic page doesn't fit well on a small monitor.You have to scroll. But half a print page does.

When I design a comic page for the web, I'm actually designing two pages. One stacked on the other makes a print page. And I have to consider not only the composition of the webcomic page, but the overall composition of a print page.


Do you ever consider incorporating animation, movement or sound of any type into your webcomics?

Yes. This subject was part of my senior thesis in art school and I ended up working very hard on something I wasn't happy with and there wasn't much of it.

Such bells and whistles need to be important to the story. I have worked professionally in traditional animation. I know how much work goes into it and I'd rather put that energy into making ten pages than 6 seconds. So far, I haven't found it necessary to put music or animation in a comic. I am planning to, though, when my current story gets more surreal. But if I did it where I'm at right now, it would just be busy work and unnecessary.


Do you know what kind of audience has your work has found on the web? Do you see a lot of crossover between webcomics readers and fans of print comics?

Its sort of hazy who is a fan of my work. I've found links to my site on atheist and buddhist forums, mainly because religious and philosphical themes are important on my work that's online. There was one podcast about print comics and superheroes that did a review of one of my comics. I even found a link on a site that features gay porn (the best guess I could make about this is that I was poking fun at Mormons and with prop8, they like making fun of Mormons too.... but maybe my main male character is kinda cute). I'd like to think I'm attracting people who like good story and like good art, even if they have or haven't read a comic book in their life.

With my work, I want to attract people who don't usually read superhero comics or pop manga. The Wednesday comic shop junky can easily become a fan of my work. And I welcome them because I used to be one. But since I'm on the web and I'm basically giving it away for free, I might as well go for anyone that'll care. It might just be five people but I'll do the type of work that interests me...

Labels: , , ,

Monday, July 27, 2009

I made Neil Gaiman say "Space Mexican"

I didn't realize how nervous I would be during the Eisners Award Ceremony. We got free food. Free good food and Rick Geary was standing in front of me in line. There were celebrity presenters to liven up the show.

And Neil Gaiman was my presenter.

Congratulations to Carla Speed McNeil for winning the Eisner Award for Best Webcomic (or Digital Comic).

Labels: ,

Friday, July 17, 2009

San Diego Comic Con News

Sorry for not working on any new pages, but I've been not only preparing for Comic Con, but dealing with life in general.

I will be at San Diego Comic Con from July 22nd to July 26th at Red Eye Art (Table B-03).

I won't be able to use my big banner.

You can follow my Twitter account to get up to date news and find out where I am and what I'm doing.

And if you want to check out the Eisner Awards its on Friday the 24th at the new Hilton San Diego Bayfront in the Indigo Room.

You're only allowed to go if you cheer really loud when they announce my name.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

The Girls Entertainment Network: Best Digital Comic


http://www.girlsentertainmentnetwork.com/best-digital-comic/

Down at Girls Entertainment Network They just did a review about the Eisner Nominees for Best Digital Comic.

They're also holding a contest. You can win, as they call it, an "Eisner-nominated prize pack". I assume that would be a bunch of free Eisner Nominated comics, but don't take my word on it.

So make a COMMENT and you might get FREE STUFF

The last day to make comments is Friday.

Anyway, I'm tempted to comment on the review. But when I make a comment about my work, what I thought would be a short little comment, turns out to be a long-ass essay. Its like I want the last word. I'm trying to not make that into a habit.

So I'll make my comments here:
Perhaps I'm a bit of a masochist, but I'd like people to say-- "The art could've been better" or "The characters weren't fleshed out" I'd like to know where I fell short because my best work will always be my next comic and today's criticisms help make tomorrow's comic better... and I mean constructive criticism.

And in award nominations like these, I would've expected the writers and editor at GEN to simply say "This is our Eisner win prediction". They might as well since Eisner voting has ended a little less than a month ago and they would have no effect on the votes.

Who knows, if they predicted, they might get all their predictions right, and next year this site might be "The Crystal Ball"

And I'm usually at the last of these Eisner Nominee lists. Is it because I'm the underdog? Is it because people aren't sure what to make of a Mexican in Space? Is it because you save the best for last? Who knows.

Its interesting to read reviews on Speak No Evil. Its almost like you get a Rorschach test on the reviewer's economic class and ethnic background.

--well, I got the comment demon out of me. Maybe I'll post something and see if I'll get something for free.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Girls Entertainment Network Presents Eisners 2009

And now this important message from The Girls Entertainment Network:

For one exciting week in July, the GEN comics team reviews over fifty books nominated for the 2009 Eisner Awards!

In celebration of the 2009 Eisner Awards, the Girls Entertainment Network comics team will be presenting a week-long feature event focusing on a select ten nomination categories: Best Short Story, Best Continuing Series, Best Limited Series, Best New Series, Best Digital Comic, Best Writer, Best Writer/Artist, Best Penciller/Inker or Penciller/Inker Team, Best Cover Artist, and Best Coloring. The articles--released two at a time for a total of ten articles--will be written by the five comics staff members and focus on one category at a time, highlighting each of the nominees.

This upcoming event will help to promote comics at the Girls Entertainment Network and build a better interactive community of readers and fans. To facilitate this process and strengthen the overall outcome, three winners will be randomly chosen from a pool of commenters during the event week. The winners will be announced and contacted by the Comics Editor, Stephanie "WITA" Carmichael, at the end of the contest, and each will be awarded a custom Eisner-nominated prize pack featuring a congratulatory note from the GEN comics girls!

The Eisner review feature is the biggest undertaking from the GEN comics section yet and results from the collaboration of dozens of publishers and creators--including Marvel, DC, Dark Horse, and many more! The event and contest will begin Monday, July 6th and end Friday, July 10th.


I just thought this was an appropriate image- Elan'

Labels: , ,

Monday, June 15, 2009

God(tm) - The Marketing Strategy



I've started a new section, Section 5: The Marketing Strategy. We're working with Guest Artist, Tom Tierney who happens to work for a very affordable wage.

If you haven't finished reading the last section, or just aren't sure if you finished reading it, or just feel like reading it all over again, its still available online.

And also, today is the last day to vote for the Eisners. If you are webcomics creator or comic book creator, you are eligible to vote.

As I've been making a big whoop about it, Speak No Evil is nominated for Best Digital Comic.

If I win this award, I guarantee you that I'll give a very memorable acceptance speech.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, June 12, 2009

Robot 6 on the digital comic nominees

At Robot 6 they did a little piece on this year's Digital Comics Eisner Nominees. They're questioning, "What is a web comic?" and ask if this year's nominees fits into their definition of it.

[I was asked this same question for an article on Animation Magazine and I'll let you know when that issue comes out.]

Anyway, I put my two cents about web comics and this particular Eisner category in the comments, and when the administrator of that blog approves it, you can read it.


http://robot6.comicbookresources.com/2009/06/unbound-reconsidering-the-eisners/comment-page-1/#comment-11269

Labels: ,

Monday, May 4, 2009

Peoples reviewing me

Down at Fool's Gold Press Paul Sloboda did a review of God(tm). He says many nice things about it. And I say many nice things about his book. Lately he's been putting up comics online (partially because I told him to).

Also at Webcomics Overlook I'm reviewed along side all the other Eisner Nominees. This is a much more unbiased review. I'm not El Santo's favorite. But also he doesn't get that this story was a comedy and a tragedy all at the same time.

...either that or I can't make up my mind what genre to stick to when I write stuff.


At least he makes reasonable arguements.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Can't vote for the Eisner's? You can vote on Polldady!

I'm just reposting this because the headline would be better for an RSS reader. Yes, its 2:35 in the morning, yes I got nothing better to do than get people to vote for me on some poll. But if you think that Speak No Evil is Eisner worthy, or if you want me to get popular enough that I get paid to do my own comics and I don't need to work some unstable animation gig in order to pay rent--thus more comics from me, then vote for me! Either at Polldaddy.com or suvudu.com

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Press stuff

There's a nice little article about this years Eisner Digital Comics Nominees. You might not be eligible to vote for my comic for the Eisners, but you could at least vote for it on their little poll.

Visit suvudu.com and if you feel like voting for the underdog, vote for "Speak No Evil"

Also, at webcomicbeacon.com the mention "Speak No Evil" and "God(tm) (c) 2XX8 *** ***** ****** ******* Incorporated. All rights reserved. God and all related characters, titles, names and documents are trademarks of *** ***** ****** ******* Incorporated. No similarity between any of the names, characters, persons and/or institutions in this deity with those of any living or dead person or institutions is intended and any such similarity which may exist is purely coincidental." This is probably the first bit of press that-- what I wish to be the Theory of Everything Comics flagship (though it probably won't end up that way) has ever gotten.

It's probably because I'm telling everyone that its okay to just call it "God(tm)" and that the entire title would take up a good portion of the podcast.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, April 25, 2009

For Your Eisner Consideration

The ballots are out for the Eisners!

So, if you're a comic book professional or retailer, please check out Speak No Evil and consider it when you vote for Best Digital Comic for this year's Eisner.

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 13, 2009

Speak No Evil: Winner of a Beaky Award

The thing with Speak No Evil was that it felt like a neglected child who I thought had potential. Sure, the first born got all the attention and I was concentrating a lot of time on the youngest, but I knew that my middle child was special.

I'm proud to say that Speak No Evil: Melancholy of A Space Mexican is the recipient of the Webcomic Beacon Standalone Simplex Beaky Award. I didn't even know I was nominated because I haven't had time to check out the Webcomic Beacon podcast for a while.



Yes, the Eisners Awards are much more established and much bigger and you actually get a physical award. But my problem with Eisner's Best Digital Comics Award is that there should be more than one, like Best Daily Digital Comic or Best Digital Comic Story, etc. etc. I get the feeling that the judges who picked the nominees aren't that familiar with the webcomic world.

I've found a few blogs about the Eisner Digital Comics Nominees, complaining about how they've never heard of them. They talk about how there are much more popular webcomics that deserve an Eisner nomination.

But the Beakys are much more down-to-earth. The judges LOVE webcomics and the podcast helps me keep up with what's out there on the net and how much my website needs to be re-designed.

I like how they think my comic is good, but they seem very uncomfortable explaining why it is good.

I must be doing something right.



Basically, this award means acceptance from the burgeoning and evolving webcomics community. A community that might eventually take over the traditional print comics/comic shop system.

...but it would've been nice if they contacted me.

Hopefully, this might be a good barometer to the Eisner winner.

Check out their podcast.

Labels: , , , , ,

Saturday, April 11, 2009

2009 Eisner Nominees

So this year's Eisner Awards in Digital Comics is very special for me. Speak No Evil has been nominated. I could go on and on about it, as I have been telling the great news to friends. But lets look at the other nominees and why they're deserving of an Eisner.


Bodyworld
, by Dash Shaw
This comic book is an entire graphic novel online. It has twelve chapters and I've only gotten to Chapter Three or Four so far. Its very designy and has a good color palette. The story is set in the near future about a drug addicted botanist who has to test a newly discovered plant. I just got to the chapter that shows what the plant does when you smoke it. I could imagine reading this on a couch, blankets over my lap, by a lamp. I would probably be done reading it within a day. But as a digital comic, sitting on an office chair, looking at it on a screen, clicking, clicking, clicking-- I could only read a few chapters at a time.


Finder, by Carla Speed McNeil
This isn't Carla Speed McNeil's first Eisner nomination. She already has a fan-base with Finder and has done other print comics. She has this very fluid brush line that I'd like to see more of. She has a very feminine quality to her work. I know nothing of "Finder". The Eisner entry starts somewhere in the middle in this world. It took me a while to get used to it.


The Lady's Murder, by Eliza Frye
"The Lady's Murder" is just beautiful. Its full of fluid shapes and color flowing from page to page. Its just pretty. When I read this, I could live with not getting an Eisner this year.


Vs., by Alexis Sottile & Joe Infurnari
This is another comic, if it wins, I could understand. Joe Infurnari was nominated last year in the same category for The Process. Last year Joss Wheadon's comic won. Although Vs. is nowhere near as crazy or beautiful as "The Process", its still a fun comic about living with next-door neighbors.


By the way, this story is part of an anthology called Next-Door Neighbor edited by Dean Haspiel.

Last but not least:
Speak No Evil: Melancholy of A Space Mexican, by Elan' Rodger Trinidad
I probaby see more things wrong with this comic than I see right. So you be the judge.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

Space Mexicans and Eisners and junk

Hello new guests. I am fully aware of how much my site's navigation sucks. Hopefully I can remedy this soon.

Anyway, a few things off my chest.

Oddly, when I was writing Speak No Evil: Melancholy of A Space Mexican I was approaching it as a comedy. I actually thought that it was a tragic comedy. Now that I have some distance from the creation process, the subtitle doesn't seem as appropriate anymore. Some friends had a theory that I viewed it as a comedy to deal with how depressing it was. I have a theory that comedy and tragedy are two sides of the same coin and when you feel like you're making something of quality, naming it a comedy or tragedy doesn't really matter.

Oh well, it seemed like a good idea to name it "Space Mexican" at the time and I respect the unemployed artist I knew from a year ago.

I just hope that the comic doesn't come off as patronizing. So far, one mexican has said it wasn't.

Other friends have asked, "I though Devil and the Monk would be nominated for an Eisner." As much as Devil and the Monk has been a staple of Stumbleupon hits to my site, I felt there were a lot of things wrong with it, technically. I would've submitted God(tm), but as of today, I still don't think it makes sense (I just need one more page, then it'll sort of make sense.)

I've noticed in the webcomics community, people are saying "I've never heard of these comics." Well, let me explain what's going on. The publisher, in this case digital comic creator, submits their comic to the Eisner people (or to be more precise, Jackie Estrada). The rules for Digital Comics favor long form comics. And the long form comic isn't as popular as the daily strip webcomic.

I think that there should be at least two, if not five categories for webcomics. One for daily strips. Although, traditionally, daily strips are the realm of the National Cartoonists Society. Comic books are the realm of the Comic Book industry. And there has been debate if a Comic Strip and a Comic book should even be considered as the same thing.

I personally don't think so. Its like having a five line poem and a 305 page novel up for a Pulitzer.

Anyway, the long-form format on the web isn't as developed or as popular as the daily strip. Mainly because people who do comic books could, 20 years ago, self-publish. And the people who did daily strips, 20 years ago, could only published through syndication or local newspapers, no independence. So, of course, the daily strip jumped on the net with much more fervor.

Anyway, I'm up against some really good talent. I think my only strengths are my story, the oddness and originality of it, and its depressing. Often times, people confuse depressing stories with good stories.

Though I'd never say my comic isn't good.

Labels: , , , ,

Monday, April 6, 2009

Eisner Award Nominated "Speak No Evil"

So this morning I was surprised to get this e-mail:

Congratulations! "Speak No Evil" has been nominated for a 2009 Will Eisner Comics Industry Award in the Best Digital Comic category. I'm still in the process of verifying all the Eisner nominations, but we are planning the official announcement for tomorrow.

Ballots will be going out in mid-April, and the winners will be announced at Comic-Con International at the Eisner Awards ceremony on July 24.

Best,

Jackie Estrada
Eisner Awards Administrator


Of course I called my Mom.

You can check out the comic here. Or go to the mirror site: http://tinyurl.com/SNEmirror

Labels: , , ,